If you spot something wrong on this site — a factual error, an outdated detail, a broken link — email [email protected] and tell us which page, what looks wrong, and, where possible, a source that supports the correction. That single channel handles every correction request on the site; there is no separate form to fill out.

Scope of This Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat

This is the process page, not the principle page. This Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page describes exactly what happens after you report something: what qualifies as a correction, how we mark one publicly, and how long it should take. Our Disclaimer and Editorial Policy both point here instead of repeating this process, and this page is where that promise actually gets kept.

What Counts as a Correction

Here is the specific line this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page draws. A correction covers factual errors: a wrong statistic, an outdated price or availability claim, an incorrect statement about a breed trait, a broken or dead link, or a claim that contradicts what a source we cited actually says. It also covers a fact that was accurate when published but has since changed — a discontinued product, an updated veterinary consensus, a company that has since renamed itself. If it is a verifiable fact and it is wrong, it qualifies.

What counts as a correction, and what doesn’t.

What Doesn't Count as a Correction

Disagreement with an opinion, a stylistic choice, or a review score is not a correction in the sense this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page covers, even though we still want to hear it. If you think a product review scored something too generously or too harshly, that feedback belongs in the process described in our Review Policy, under "If You Disagree With a Score," not here. This page is for getting facts right, not for renegotiating editorial judgment.

Anonymous Reports Are Fine

You do not need to give us your name to report an error, though it helps if we need to follow up with a question about the source you are citing. This Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page treats an anonymous, well-sourced report exactly the same as a signed one — the accuracy of the claim matters, not who is making it.

How a correction is marked publicly on the page.

How We Mark a Correction Publicly

This is the visible half of this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page — the part a reader actually sees. When we correct a factual error, we add a short “Updated” note with the date near the top of the page, stating what changed in plain terms rather than silently editing the text and leaving no trace.

Our Editorial Policy already mentions that a visible update date is a signal readers can rely on; this page is where that mechanism is actually defined. Being visible about a correction, rather than editing silently, is consistent with Google’s own guidance on trustworthy content. We do not remove or hide the fact that a page was corrected, even when the original error is a little embarrassing.

Minor typo fixes vs. corrections that change a verdict.

Minor vs. Substantial Corrections

This distinction is the most practical part of this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page. Not every correction carries the same weight, and we treat them differently on purpose. A minor correction — a typo, a broken link, a small factual slip that does not change the substance of the page — gets fixed with a brief "Updated" note and no further fanfare. A substantial correction is different: if new information changes a review's score, a recommendation, or a conclusion an article reached, the "Updated" note says so explicitly, describing what changed and why, so a reader who saw the original version understands exactly what is different now.

Corrections to Product Reviews Specifically

A factual correction to a review — a wrong ingredient list, an outdated price, a discontinued size — follows the same process described in this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page. If that same correction also changes the review's score under the rubric in our Review Policy, it is treated as substantial, and the "Updated" note states the old and new score rather than only the fact that changed.

Corrections That Affect Multiple Pages

Because our six hub pages link out to related articles and reviews, a single factual error can sometimes appear in more than one place — a hub page and an article underneath it, for example. When we correct an error, we check for and update every page where it appears, not just the one that was originally reported to us.

If We Can't Verify a Report

Sometimes a reported error turns out to be a genuine disagreement between sources rather than a clear factual mistake — two veterinary sources that state something slightly differently, for instance. When that happens, we tell you what we found rather than making a silent decision either way, and if the underlying topic is genuinely unsettled, we would rather say so on the page than present false certainty.

Who Reviews a Reported Correction

A human editor checks every correction report against the original source before anything changes on the page — we do not accept or reject a correction automatically, consistent with the human review standard already described in our Editorial Policy. If we disagree that something is an error, we will tell you why rather than silently ignoring the report.

Expected Response Time

The timeline promised by this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page is deliberately modest rather than aspirational. We aim to acknowledge a correction report within a few business days and to resolve straightforward factual corrections within that same window. A correction that requires deeper research — verifying a claim against a primary source, or re-testing something for a review — can take longer, but we will tell you that directly rather than leaving your report unanswered. If a week passes with no response from us, that is itself worth a follow-up email; reports occasionally do get missed, and we would rather hear about that too.

Relationship to Our Editorial Policy

This Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page is the specific mechanism behind a principle already stated in our Editorial Policy: an error found and left uncorrected is worse than the error itself. That page describes the editorial standard in general; this page describes exactly how a correction moves from your email to a published change.

Changes to This Corrections Policy

We may update this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page as our process for handling corrections changes. The date at the top of this page reflects the most recent revision.

Contact Us

If you have found an error on this site or have questions about this Corrections Policy MyNorwegianCat page, contact Nina Fentanes, publisher and legal representative, at [email protected].

Spread the love